Concept-of-the-week

Pre-money vs. post-money SAFEs

You close a $500K pre-money SAFE with your first angel at a $4M cap. Three months later, another angel puts in $250K on the same terms. Both feel like clean early checks.

Then you price your seed round and both SAFEs convert. Your first angel expected roughly 12.5% ownership. What they get is less, because a pre-money SAFE's conversion math doesn't count the other SAFE's shares. Both instruments dilute each other on the way in, then the new round dilutes everyone on the way out.

Post-money SAFEs solve the stacking problem. Each investor's ownership is locked at signing. $500K on a $4M post-money cap means 12.5%, regardless of how many other SAFEs you close. The tradeoff: your total dilution from the SAFE stack is fixed and visible from day one, which pushes investors to negotiate harder on the cap.

Neither is founder-friendly by default. The question is which surprise you'd rather face: uncertain ownership at conversion, or a harder cap negotiation upfront.

What we’re watching

SpaceX's dual-class playbook

Source: SpaceX.com

SpaceX filed its S-1 on May 20, listing on Nasdaq as SPCX with Class B shares carrying 10 votes each and Class A just one. Musk holds 85.1% of voting power going into the offering.

The structure is unusual for a reason. SpaceX stayed private far longer than most companies, ran secondaries instead of dilutive primary rounds, and Musk personally backstopped early financing. Most founders don't have that option. You raise priced rounds, give up board seats, and accept protective provisions (the list of decisions investors can veto) along the way.

That's why the round-by-round choices matter more for you, not less. A 3-person board with one independent seat at seed becomes a 5-person board where you hold two seats by Series B — same founder, very different veto math. Drag-along thresholds, consent rights on share issuances, and board composition all compound the same way. By Series B, the levers you still control are mostly set, and harder to unwind at exit than to negotiate going in.

Worth modeling now: what voting power and board control you actually hold two rounds out.

This week’s highlights

  • Modular raises $250M at $1.6B to let developers run AI across any chip (Source)

  • Exa Labs raises $250M at $2.2B, tripling valuation; a16z leads AI search bet (Source)

  • Mercury raises $200M Series D at $5.2B; OCC bank charter conditionally approved (Source)

  • RADAR raises $170M Series B at $1B valuation for AI-powered retail inventory (Source)

  • Zyphra raising $500M Series B at $5B+; AMD among committed investors (Source)

See you next week,

Team EquityList

Did you find this newsletter useful?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Keep Reading